PC Talk:Asshattery

From Loranon

Revision as of 11:10, 24 September 2007 (edit) Ferrispc (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 11:13, 24 September 2007 (edit) (undo) Ferrispc (Talk | contribs) Next diff →
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I agree, it was going well until I invited some asshats into the editing process. Nobody besides me seemed interested in looking up CRs and ELs and we have a genuine lack of information in some cases concerning monster names and quantity. I'm going to remove the separate puzzle event entry because I actually think that was a cool puzzle and not asshattery as bisquick claims.		I agree, it was going well until I invited some asshats into the editing process. Nobody besides me seemed interested in looking up CRs and ELs and we have a genuine lack of information in some cases concerning monster names and quantity. I'm going to remove the separate puzzle event entry because I actually think that was a cool puzzle and not asshattery as bisquick claims.
		+
		+	I'm going to remove the subentries that are not quantifiable as I do not think they add to the argument.

---

Revision as of 11:13, 24 September 2007

This page starts out strong, but ends a little weak. I think more demonstrated points would strengthen the case.

I agree, it was going well until I invited some asshats into the editing process. Nobody besides me seemed interested in looking up CRs and ELs and we have a genuine lack of information in some cases concerning monster names and quantity. I'm going to remove the separate puzzle event entry because I actually think that was a cool puzzle and not asshattery as bisquick claims.

I'm going to remove the subentries that are not quantifiable as I do not think they add to the argument.